Case Study: Serverless Consolidation for Event-Driven Workloads
Overview
A product team had accumulated 50+ AWS Lambda functions, cron jobs, and ad-hoc scripts over several years. Deployments were fragile, monitoring was inconsistent, and no one had a complete picture of what ran where.
Webomage helped consolidate this into a structured, observable serverless architecture using the Serverless Framework, clear environments, and CI/CD.
Challenges
- Lambda sprawl – dozens of functions created over time by different people with no shared patterns.
- Manual, inconsistent deployments – functions updated via console clicks or one-off scripts.
- Limited observability – hard to see which functions were failing, retrying, or driving most cost.
- No clear environments – dev/staging/prod boundaries were fuzzy, increasing risk when shipping changes.
- Onboarding pain – new engineers struggled to understand which jobs mattered and how they interacted.
Approach
- Inventory & mapping
- Collected all functions, scripts, and triggers (events, schedules, queues).
- Grouped them by domain and business purpose, not just by technical resource.
- Designing a target serverless architecture
- Designed a set of Serverless Framework services with clear boundaries and naming.
- Standardised environment configuration, secrets handling, and IAM roles.
- Introduced dev/stage/prod stages with predictable URLs and triggers.
- Incremental consolidation
- Migrated functions into Serverless Framework definitions in batches, with tests where possible.
- Replaced ad-hoc scripts and console changes with version-controlled deploys.
- Added health checks and alarms for critical flows (queues, scheduled jobs, webhooks).
- CI/CD & guardrails
- Wired deployments into Git-based CI/CD (GitHub Actions / GitLab CI).
- Added basic checks before deploy (linting, tests, dry runs).
- Documented how to roll back and how to safely roll out changes between stages.
- Handover & documentation
- Produced diagrams and runbooks that showed how functions, queues, and external services fit together.
- Gave the team playbooks for adding new functions in the same structured way.
Outcomes
- Reduced operational risk – fewer “mystery functions” and safer deploys across environments.
- Better visibility – dashboards and alerts around key flows instead of silent failures.
- Simpler onboarding – new engineers could see serverless topology and deployment patterns in one place.
- Easier evolution – the team could add new event-driven features without worsening the sprawl.
Relevant capabilities
- Serverless Framework and Terraform for event-driven workloads on AWS.
- CI/CD patterns for Lambda and supporting services.
- Observability and alerting for asynchronous systems.
- Pragmatic consolidation from “Lambda sprawl” to a maintainable architecture.
➡️ If your serverless setup feels fragile or hard to reason about, start a conversation.